Vance Criticizes Brennan’s Smear Tactics
Margaret Brennan, CBS anchor, tried to use selective headlines to attack Tulsi Gabbard. Vice-President J.D. Vance strongly disagreed with her approach.
Vance Defends Gabbard’s Nomination
In their exchange, Vance defended Gabbard’s nomination for Director of National Intelligence. He argued that conservative outlets have lost their relevance.
Selective Criticism of Gabbard
Brennan pointed to criticism from The Wall Street Journal and National Review. These outlets had called Gabbard an “atrocious nominee” and criticized her stance on Edward Snowden and U.S. intelligence. Brennan asked, “Does any of this give you pause putting her in charge of U.S. intelligence?”
Vance’s Firm Rebuttal
Vance responded firmly, stating, “These publications attacked Trump obsessively. But they don’t decide who the president is. The American people do. Trump picks his cabinet, not these outdated publications.”
Senate’s Role in the Confirmation Process
Brennan reminded Vance that the Senate will decide. Vance acknowledged this, but confidently added that Gabbard will be confirmed. He highlighted her military service and high-level security clearance over nearly two decades.
Restoring Trust in Intelligence Services
Vance praised Gabbard’s impeccable character and record of service. He emphasized that restoring trust in intelligence services was vital, as bureaucrats have misused power. He believes Gabbard can help reform these agencies.
Brennan’s Pushback
Brennan countered, saying Gabbard doesn’t trust the intelligence services. However, Vance remained confident in her ability to bring much-needed change.
Shifting Politics and Media Narratives
This interview reflects a shift toward more substantive debates on national security. Vance’s strong support for Gabbard reinforces the idea that nominees should be judged by their credentials, not media-driven narratives.